Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pikec

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a7, just a roundabout way of saying "My friend Pikec is a cute person." NawlinWiki (talk) 17:40, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pikec

Pikec (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:RS and WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 12:26, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete, Also fails WP:NOTDICDEF. FusionMix 12:28, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable, no sources. Renee (talk) 13:01, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Seems like a dictionary article, not notable, no sources. Seems like a hoax article. WP:HOAX Sv23 (talk) 13:20, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete; nom is incorrect in saying fails WP:RS, as RS is not a criterion for deletion that an article can pass or fail. That said, the article fails any number of things that are indeed criteria for deletion including WP:N and WP:NOR. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 13:43, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - No evidence of notability provided, none found. No sources provided, none found. Dicdef. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:19, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete and move to wiktionary, if it qualifies. BuickCenturyDriver (talk) 14:25, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete since no such word exists in English, as far as I know.--Berig (talk) 17:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.