Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre Verbeck

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 21:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pierre Verbeck

Pierre Verbeck (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This is a hoax; no such porn star exists. No Google hits, no filmography at any of the gay porn retail sites. —Chidom talk  03:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - 17 ghits, mostly from the same site, verifiability problems. MER-C 04:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Per MER-C's spectacularly low google hits. Created by single purpose account [1]. Unverified biography of a living person. Judging by the text of the article, this seems to have been lifted from elsewhere, although Google doesn't return anything for the exact phrases from the article. -- IslaySolomon | talk 06:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete — Delete, the guy's also not notable. –- kungming·2 | (Talk·Contact) 07:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Interesing to note that two of the names mentioned here are from the aerospace article "Orthogonal collocation of the nonlinear Boltzman equation"!SkierRMH 09:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, definitely fails the criteria, unverifiable. Sounds like a hoax. --Terence Ong (C | R) 13:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. There are enough male porn stars on Wikipedia as it is. And I'm talking about contributors, not articles. Black-Velvet 14:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. No such porn star today. Having said that, this name does turn up hits for a 18th c. German genealogy web site. Augurr 18:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete obvious hoax, Google hits indicate nothing relatively noteworthy.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 20:09, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Hoax/vanity/ad. Spinach Dip 20:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.