Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pidgin coup

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.--Húsönd 04:41, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pidgin coup

Pidgin coup (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

As far as I can determine this is a neologism. No relevant independent Ghits here. Da Pigeon Coup is the handle of a linguistic group in the field but not related to this definition. Fails WP:V. Delete. BlueValour 02:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete No attempt made to explain origins of the term which appears to be slang among linguists. Antonrojo 02:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. MER-C 03:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nominator. James086 Talk | Contribs 04:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Missvain 04:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, neologism. SkierRMH,11:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Hello32020 16:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Pidgin English is well known enough but I can't find anything to verify this. Mallanox 19:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment There must be some other article on the phenomenon of hybrid languages, no? (I agree that this term is a neologism and should be deleted) Allon Fambrizzi 23:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)Allon Fambrizzi
  • Weak Keep - This is a rather well-known term. I think it just needs citations. .V. 23:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.