Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Picasion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per G11.   jj137 ^♠ 20:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Picasion

Picasion (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

nonnotable website Choosing123 (talk) 12:51, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 07:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Phoenix-wiki 17:51, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. No reliable sources establish notability. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:37, 30 December 2007

(UTC)

• Speedy Delete as it is so blatantly spam. 1 editor (most likely creator/staff member of the site. Not a lick of notability. Article clearly pushes the website on its readers.--Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 15:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.