Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pianopoli
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. Wikibofh 14:35, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Pianopoli
Pianopoli exists and is a village in Calabria. The rest is patent, unverified nonsense. Delete this to have a clean slate when someone gets arount to write a real entry on the place. Pilatus 02:35, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep AFD is not the right tag for this. I think you need a request for expansion. Borisblue 02:52, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and tag for cleanup and expansion as per Borisbleu. --CastAStone 05:30, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as per everyone else and everyone else bound to follow. [edit] 05:31, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand as real place with real communities of interest. I have created a small stub on this town and it is now listed in the Italian stubs area. I have also added a couple of references. Capitalistroadster 05:42, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Capitalistroadster's new stub, which is now listed in the Italian geography stubs area, where it should be! Grutness...wha? 07:13, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- A little too small for my liking, but the stub is verifiable and true, and I don't see why we can't have a verifiable article on an Italian village. Keep. - Mgm|(talk) 08:54, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. utcursch | talk 11:26, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, also perhaps there should be a project for foreign cities as I find some pretty bad ones in the Wikify category. Some have to be completely rewritten as they are incoherent. I try to clean up or rewrite them as best as I can, as I think they should be included. However, Google is usually useless for small foreign cities, especially in the Middle East and India, and I don't have any books or knowledge about them. -- Kjkolb 02:55, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- keep please as we always do when it is about a village or town or city Yuckfoo 02:57, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as valid stub. But really, I think instead of nominating this type of article, just fix it, add a stub tag, and if someone wants to write a real entry, they will be pointed to the stub already. MCB 00:47, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.