Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phytotechnology Laboratories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedily deleted by Kimchi.sg. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 12:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Phytotechnology Laboratories

Seems to be an ad, non-notable --BradBeattie 02:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - does not meet WP:CORP. No Gnews hits. Ghits are only ads/non-notable mentions. — ERcheck (talk) 03:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, reads like an ad, fails WP:CORP. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Their product line includes: amino acids, buffers, gelling agents and Vitamins: in other words, SPAM. --die Baumfabrik 05:01, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per WP:CORP --Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 17:21, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above and notability. --Domthedude001 18:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per db-bio ~Kylu (u|t) 04:02, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I found evidence that it's a real company. It's listed as a supplier to the U.S. Department of Agriculture at http://www.ars.usda.gov/Main/docs.htm?docid=9985 and it was an exhibitor at the 2005 annual meeting of the American Society of Plant Biologists at http://www.aspb.org/meetings/pb-2005/currentexhibitors.cfm Perhaps in those contexts it's notable. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 05:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.