Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Physicalitisation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:46, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Physicalitisation

Physicalitisation (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Im not sure it means anything, but I might be wrong. I almost speedied this as nonsense, but I wanted to make sure I wasn't just being dense. — Coren (talk) 12:19, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

The AfD tag on the article itself was missing, so I added it. ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 14:41, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Very deep thinking, or then again perhaps not. Delete. -- Hoary 12:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It is impossible to verify this article from reliable sources. It might be a hoax as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 13:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Dephysicalitise Has no potential to be any more encyclopaedic than the unverifiable stub it is now. Sheffield Steeltalkstalk 17:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete incomprehensibilitisation. JJL 23:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete There appears to be a close match at physicalisation. Maybe this belongs in Wiktionary.....but not here. -----Adimovk5 06:00, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
    • Poor old Wiktionary. What has it done to deserve to be the dumping ground for the waste products of Wikipedia? -- Hoary 06:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This is both bollocks and a neologism. Cardamon 17:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless the closing admin can close this AfD without touching the keyboard or mouse, in which case keep as some kind of explanation for such magical mopwielding. -- But|seriously|folks  18:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Physicalisation doesn't seem to have anything to do with this. Someguy1221 21:45, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.