Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Photostitch
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List_of_Canon_products#Software. All of the content is already there apparently. W.marsh 13:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Photostitch
Standalone promotional page. The product should be added to the List_of_Canon_products page or maybe the Panorama Stitchers, Viewers and Utilities page. John Spikowski 21:12, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Merge as the nominator suggests. It is difficult to see how the page could be expanded beyond the single sentence that it currently is. CIreland 21:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Merge Cover it elsewhere and turn this into a redirect. Adrian M. H. 16:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment the line of text for this page has been added to the new "Software" section on the List_of_Canon_products page. Recommend Speedy Delete.
- No. If you have merged the text then Photostitch should be made a redirect to List of Canon products when the AFD is closed to preserve the history. CIreland 05:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Makes sense to me. John Spikowski 07:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- No. If you have merged the text then Photostitch should be made a redirect to List of Canon products when the AFD is closed to preserve the history. CIreland 05:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
I don't think it should be deleted.
- Redirect per CIreland. HeirloomGardener 12:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Yet another AfD for a software like for PTgui, PTgui (2nd nomination), Hugin (software), PTLens,... that is not on John Spikowskis sponsor list [1] as the competing products from Kekus, RealVis, Easypano,.... so the nomination is clearly a WP:COI. --Wuz 12:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- It really is best if we assume good faith. The suggestion to merge was a sensible one which seems to have gathered some support, after all.CIreland 13:18, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
