Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Photofeed

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Merge proposal can be discussed further on the talkpage. WjBscribe 14:53, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Photofeed

Photofeed (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No sources. Neologism. Non-notable. Appears to be original research. Pdelongchamp 19:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. -Seinfreak37 14:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge with web feed.Mystache 00:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep I think the specific aggregators mentioned (& I expect there will be more) are sufficient for this to be worth a separate article --
  • Keep could use a ref, but there's no ambiguity about what a photofeed is. (plus i learned something) the_undertow talk 03:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep on condition Notabality is established espically with connection to iphoto and flickr. However without sources this article cannot be kept. --St.daniel 12:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Is a notable topic and is not original research. Requires references but number of ghits makes me sure sources can and will be found. Davewild 15:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I agree it passes WP:OR, WP:N. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 16:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
    • TonyTheTiger, could you elaborate on how it passes these guidelines? Thanks. Pdelongchamp 20:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge with Media RSS. Neither article has enough content by itself but Photofeed is an RSS media application. It should be a subsection of said article, with a redirect. Wysdom 04:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.