Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhotoDrop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PhotoDrop

Seems to be promotion for a service that is non-notable (the article even admits "PhotoDrop technology remains rather unused. This is mainly due to lack of public knowledge of the technology"). Andrew Levine 06:53, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Little-used application with no claims as to notability. -- (aeropagitica)  07:04, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable website, self-admitted. Also doesn't sound very useful -- 4MB is enough for one photo from today's digital cameras. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 08:18Z
• Delete: PhotoDrop currently doesn't use it's own domain name, instead is hidden within RichardRussell.com. Now that's a really notable product! Daniel Case 16:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with thanks to the author for making it so easy. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 22:41, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per everyone above. Proto t c 10:17, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.