Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhotoArt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Sango123 (e) 14:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PhotoArt

bordering on patent nonsense, probably original research, link looks like advertising... the works, really! Happy-melon 11:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Unsourced and as it stands violates WP:NOR. PJM 11:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Relmi is sprinkling herself over various parts of WP - this is classic vanity. If anyone can suggest speedy, I'm in for that too. —Wknight94 (talk) 16:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete – nn protologism dictdef with totally incomprehensible explanation. --Lambiam^Talk 18:41, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Author deleted the article except for the AFD message. --Starionwolf 06:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Article blanked by author, therefore CSD7 -- speedy delete -- Henrik Ebeltoft 00:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.