Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phonopolis

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. —Korath (Talk) 01:23, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Phonopolis

This article is not likely to become encyclopedic. It may be a new word coinage, but that's all. Furthermore, there are unsubstantiated claims. and the spelling could be improved (broadcasted ?) JoJan 19:03, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete kind of a neat idea, but clearly original research and/or a neologism. Lots of search hits for the word, but none relevant. CDC (talk) 19:29, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable dict-def. RJFJR 06:37, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete.Mikkalai 17:22, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• As per the explanation at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Phonisicle Delete. Uncle G 02:27, 2005 Feb 13 (UTC)

This article is created by a user who persistently creates neologisms with "polis". I tried to talk to him, in vain. I consider this vandalism, hence speedily deleted. Mikkalai 04:21, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.