Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoenix Gate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merged and redirected to List of magical objects in Gargoyles. NawlinWiki 00:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Phoenix Gate
The article is on a fictional object with no sources to establish real world significance. Jay32183 02:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:FICT. Material not suitable for Wikipedia. --Dhartung | Talk 04:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect back to List of magical objects in Gargoyles. It is a rather important plot element to the Gargoyles story, and it's highly plausible that someone will try and look it up here. Arkyan • (talk) 15:17, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- That is not a criterion for inclusion. Importance to the plot is irrelevant if there is no real world information. Jay32183 20:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- And did I argue for including this article? I proposed redirecting it elsewhere - that's completely different. "Merge" does not mean "copy this information and paste it there". The intent behind my comment is to take a few pertinent lines and list it in the "magical objects" article. Arkyan • (talk) 20:22, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- The article is unsourced, so there isn't anything to merge. Jay32183 20:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- And did I argue for including this article? I proposed redirecting it elsewhere - that's completely different. "Merge" does not mean "copy this information and paste it there". The intent behind my comment is to take a few pertinent lines and list it in the "magical objects" article. Arkyan • (talk) 20:22, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- That is not a criterion for inclusion. Importance to the plot is irrelevant if there is no real world information. Jay32183 20:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- The source for the information is the television show. Primary sources are acceptable for factual, neutral information. The paragraph that exists in the "magical objects" article is likely sufficient in which case a redirect will accomplish what I mentioned, but I suggest "merge/redirect" to allow for some discretion there. Arkyan • (talk) 21:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DES (talk) 06:09, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Merge/Redirect Not notable outside the show and can be adequately covered in the list of magical objects. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 22:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
