Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philosophies of Milan Kundera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Philosophies of Milan Kundera

Philosophies of Milan Kundera (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Essay, inappropriate for an encycyclopedia, 100% original research WP:OR. History suggests that it may be a recreated article. Camillus (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom as an essay overflowing with OR. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. No sources, probably OR. --DerRichter (talk) 23:01, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - No sources. Macy's123 ^{(review me)} 23:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - OR, WP:SOURCE, and SELFREF pretty much sums it up. Soxred93 | talk count bot 23:17, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, essay built on original research. Not really appropriate for Wikipedia. Lankiveil ^{(complaints | disco)} 01:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC).
• Delete per above, but also as a POV fork. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 02:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per Soxred93. --BelovedFreak 20:02, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Per nom. Even if not OR (which it certainly seems to be), this could probably be best merged with the core article anyway. This article is redundant at best. --BizMgr (talk) 21:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.