Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Winn (2nd Nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge and redirect, Gnangarra 15:12, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Phillip Winn

Clearly non-notable editor for barely notable blog... there is nothing else to make this article noteworthy. -- FamedDeletionist 21:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

  • merge anything that matters into blogcritics then delete. Kripto 10:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan 15:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge per Kripto. Burzmali 15:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete' and Merge into the other article Corpx 16:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment "Delete and merge" is incompatible with the GFDL. --Dhartung | Talk 20:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Ooops...redirect :)Corpx 01:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect, founder of a website of deserved but modest notability isn't enough for a bio. --Dhartung | Talk 20:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as there are zero references of the nontrivial, neutral sort. He runs 3 of the external links, and was a guest on the 4th. He's a hole in the ground. Bearian 21:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. I remember running across his "A Basic Citizen's Definitive Electronic Freedom Guide" back when the Web was going mainstream, his W6 site was a bigger deal in those days. The Web is a much bigger place these days, and his original site has sort of been lost in the crowd, but his status as a blogging pioneer and co-owner of Blogcritics is enough for me. --Groggy Dice T | C 07:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.