Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Torrone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 21:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Phillip Torrone

Phillip Torrone (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable. (I previously speedied it but was asked to bring it to AFD by Akadruid, and he/she is probably right: it deserves a debate.) —METS501 (talk) 18:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arkyan • (talk) 20:34, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 00:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. cab 01:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete 258k GHits, but they all seem to be stuff written by him, or at best, profiles about him by organisations he worked for, rather than independent coverage in reliable sources. cab 01:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - NN - Crockspot 04:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep Seems like a satisfactory article, I'd say it meets WP:BIO, with a couple of refs added it could be suitable.The Sunshine Man 12:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete no evidence of notability. --Daniel J. Leivick 15:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete - needs independent resources. JoJan 17:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Billy227, Review my account!! talk contribs sndbx usbx 18:35, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as nn with no references. Also the article bears no meaningful content. Basically all it says is he's a writer. So? Ford MF 06:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as not notable. None of the sources represents a reference. Even though makezine.com may be ranked 7523rd per Alexa, the subject would not necessarily qualify for an article if basic criteria or WP:BIO are not met. Ohconfucius 08:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete No sources. If verifiable, reliable sources are provided, I would reconsider. KrakatoaKatie 09:04, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.