Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Burley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. east.718 at 18:59, 11/3/2007

[edit] Philip Burley

Philip Burley (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I know the subject of this article personally and would not be surprised if the entire content was written by himself or his friends. He is not notable for inclusion on Wikipedia. Joowwww 16:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. No notability asserted beyond the band. Everything listed in the article's References section is directly lifted from the band's references, indicating no notability beyond that of the band. There is mention of the article's subject in a Times article; however, this is not enough to meet notability, as a specific biographical notability example reads "Widespread coverage over time in the media such as the BBC, The Times or other reliable sources" (emphasis mine). There is a tiny mention of the subject made in the media; hardly enough to qualify for notability. (See similar comments at Floren MacDonald's AfD) JFlav 19:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I don't want him to have another seizure, but NN. Tiptopper 01:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.