Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Jay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted, CSD A7. "Professional magician" is not an assertion of notability. Chick Bowen 21:13, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Phil Jay

No comment. Was hit with PROD tag twice in error. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 19:18, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment 1000 Ghits [1], mainly commercial listings, a few odd ("Available for weddings throughout the UK" in a Toronto directory?). Would seem nn professional magician, but I don't know what makes a magician notable. Fan1967 19:57, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. A fair number of Google hits, and his client list includes some big names. But: it's obviously a vanity article and advertiseent; and, even if the article did assert importance, he's not sufficiently notable per WP:BIO. bcasterline^talk 20:02, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP is not the Yellow Pages Advertisment.  (aeropagitica)  20:13, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.