Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Dukes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete g4, not significantly different from Philip Dukes, also fails WP:BIO. NawlinWiki 23:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Phil Dukes
AfD nominated by Jamesbourne11. No reason specified. This is a procedural nomination - my opinion is Neutral. Tevildo 22:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: This nomination appears to be nominator's first edit. (Referrring to Jamesbourne11, not Tevildo.) Newyorkbrad 22:53, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- I can shed some light on this: it's reposted rubbish. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Dukes from last October. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 23:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds like it can be speedied as recreated content, although I guess an admin should check it really is the same first (not that it looks like there's been a lot of valuable improvement since the version Fys recalls). Newyorkbrad 23:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
