Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phi technology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Phi technology

Phi technology (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Consensus at deletion review was to send this here. Note that the current stub was written by Danny; see the history for the longer version. This version had been deleted as a copyright violation at one time, but permission has been cleared through OTRS. The content is not encyclopedic, however; whether the topic itself is should be judged in this forum. Neutral nomination. Chick Bowen 00:20, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete nn, ad. JJL (talk) 01:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete per criterion A1. It's NN and an ad, too. —Jonathan 01:04, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
    • A1 doesn't apply, since contextualized versions exist in the history, and the DRV already concluded that a full debate was in order. I'd ask the closing admin to consider this a vote for simple "delete." Chick Bowen 01:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. No attempt has been made at any stage to demonstrate the notability of the product. The longer versions in the history were essentially pure spam. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 06:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, as it does not assert notability. Master of Puppets Care to share? 07:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Unremarkable piece of computer software for notability has not been established. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 21:26, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete for the lack of either assertion or evidence of notability. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:50, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, no notability is alleged nor proven. Corvus cornixtalk 18:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.