Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pheer

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was MERGE to leet. dbenbenn | talk 23:04, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pheer

I quite like our leet article, but do we really need a separate article for every leet phrase? -- Ferkelparade π 12:52, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Merge, if it's notable. Otherwise delete. Inter 14:16, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect to Leet. Doesn't need its own entry. — Asbestos | Talk 15:36, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge no redirect. I don't think it requires its own entry. --Deathphoenix 23:54, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect to Leet. Concur with Asbestos to avoid creating duplicates. --JuntungWu 02:12, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect to Leet. Agreed. Doesn't need its own entry. Longhair 10:25, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge, no need to redirect. --Idont Havaname 01:16, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to Leet and add redirect. Megan1967 02:18, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.