Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phasing (Magic mechanic)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete - Yomanganitalk 21:56, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Phasing (Magic mechanic)
The article is about a single mechanic within the game of Magic: The Gathering. While the game itself deserves a page, and the rules deserve a page (having been nominated and kept), individual mechanics do not. Khaim 04:16, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Also nominated as similar pages: Haste, Vigilance (Magic mechanic), Fear (Magic mechanic).
- Delete as per nom Khaim 04:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Merge all to Magic: The Gathering rules - Richfife 05:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Merge all per above. MER-C 06:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- I would like to point out that the information either a) already exists on that page or b) was deemed too minor to mention even on that page (see Talk:Magic:_The_Gathering_rules#Abilities). Khaim 15:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete In a game that has thousands upon thousands of cards, we can't have a separate article for every single one. Not notable at all. --The Way 09:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Reply As the creator of these, I can say I was not trying to describe each and every card, just different mechanics, especially ones where there's a story to its name or, in the case of Phasing, there's a lot of confusion. -- Jbl1975 13 October 2006 01:04 EDT
- Reply I agree with you, but Pokemon has set a pretty strong precedent here. - Richfife 02:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Reply If people have engaged in this with the Pokemon category then that doesn't necessarily count in favor of keeping this article; rather, it seems to imply that we should nominate most of those articles for deletion as well --The Way 05:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Reply They did. It didn't work. - Richfife 23:32, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Reply If people have engaged in this with the Pokemon category then that doesn't necessarily count in favor of keeping this article; rather, it seems to imply that we should nominate most of those articles for deletion as well --The Way 05:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Merge all per Richfife. - Lex 02:43, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all per WP:NOT a game guide, or failing that, merge all per above. Sandstein 07:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete neither notable nor encycopedic (i.e. game guide). Eluchil404 07:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Merge All Phasing had much more on it then what is there now. I just preferred to explain how certain names of mechanics got their names. If you feel these things could be merged into one page, then please do so, but I like the descriptions I have (and had) for each one. -- Jbl1975 13 October 2006 01:01 EDT
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
