Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pewter Report (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. – Steel 11:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pewter Report (magazine)

Pewter Report (magazine) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article has been nominated and deleted by speedy 2 times previous under PewterReport and Pewter Report with the concern of spam advertisement.--Hu12 23:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy and salt Obvious spam. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 23:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete why was this article brought back from speedy? Removing all of the blatant advertising material would leave about two sentences in the whole article. There are also no references other than the company's website, and why is this even being debated given the author's username and history? Someguy1221 23:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

brought back because author was attempting communication--Hu12 23:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.