Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petroglyph Fan Forums

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Petroglyph Fan Forums

The page was Proposed for Deletion, but because I believe it shouldnt be deleted, I decided to let the voters decide. Popcorn2008 02:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Popcorn2008

• Keep after some editing Even though I again put this up for deletion, I only did so, so a vote could decide. Personally I think it should be kept after some editing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Popcorn2008 (talk • contribs) 12:25, August 1, 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as a not notable fan forum per WP:WEB. Also seems to have problems with original research and verifiability. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 02:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete So far, this appears to be an ordinary fan forum website. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 03:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not so far, is. Alexa rating is 419,047 and ghits is 390. WP:NN WP:WEB. SynergeticMaggot 03:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above - non-notable forum. --Hetar 05:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Die fan forums, die! mboverload@ 05:55, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Web forums are rarely notable. With barely over two thousand members, this one doesn't even come close. Zetawoof^(ζ) 09:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: A web forum for people who study cave paintings, how coo...oh, a band. Wikipedia is not a web guide. Geogre 11:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WEB. Not as bad as some forum articles, but not a keeper. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --PresN 15:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per everyone above. -- Scientizzle 19:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. If the forum were an official, corporate-run forum that would be one thing, but... Sertrel 06:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.