The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete, author request. Canley (talk) 07:46, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
No reliable third party sources. WP:BALL: I'm living in Vietnam, but there's no information about this building , PetroVietnam Twin Tower is described only on Wikipedia (Vietnamese version and English version) and a Internet forum. Also, does not meet the standards of Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Magnifier (talk) 04:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Neutral - It doesn't seem so notable, but it definitely isn't non-notable as per such. If this building is genuine, then it seems encyclopaedic and relevant. αѕєηιηєt/c 06:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.