Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petpet (2 nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge with Neopet. Proto::type 11:29, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Petpet

This article was nominated for deletion in April 2005 (1st AfD here). The reasons provided then for keeping this blatant vanispamscruftisement are far from sound. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Húsönd 00:26, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Merge - Get rid of the list, and merge with Neopets. Cheers -- Imoeng 01:09, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge per Imoeng. We gave it time, but nothing changed. M1ss1ontomars2k4 (T | C | @) 01:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. With major cleanup (read: kill the list dead), it will be a short article, but still good enough to keep as a seperate article, I think. Neopets is hardly so non-notable that it only should have one article. -Amarkov babble 01:35, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge or Very weak keep A couple of these, like the noil, are well-known enough that I'm aware of them even without being a Neopets member. Probably the best way to go is merge the concept into the Neopets page with a few notable examples, but leave the big list for a Neopets wiki, if there is one. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:59, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I really don't see much here that's worth merging. It's full of irrelevant fancruft. Opabinia regalis 02:52, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with Neopets after deleting the list. What! Are there no petpetpet......s? Edison
  • Merge information into Neopets or List of Neopets. Delete huge long list of petpets (indiscriminate list of information). --`/aksha 05:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
    • After looking at the Neopets article, i don't think a merge of Petpet into the main Neopets article will be at all feasible. The main article is long enough anyway. Petpet is also quite a small part of neopets, putting it onto the main article will look very out of place. Besides, i think people watching the main Neopets article are very likely to just remove the petpet info even if someone went and dumped it there. I think merge into List of Neopets is better, or maybe just a straight delete. --`/aksha 10:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge whatever is salvageable to Neopets, Delete the rest, including that indiscriminate list.-- danntm T C 03:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete or Weak keep because merging into main Neopets article is unfeasible (technically, it's just an item, and if we had to expand on petpets, where would we draw the line on what items should or should not be described?) Lmblackjack21 13:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with Neopets and/or List of Neopets. Let the editors of those articles decide how much of this (if any) should be merged. --- RockMFR 06:05, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.