Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Weisenbacher
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ⇒ SWATJester On Belay! 19:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Peter Weisenbacher
This all sounds great, but there are no third party reliable sources for notability. I can't find any mention of this man on Amnesty International's website; if he is one of the directors then this would be notability but it needs reliable sourcing. — coelacan — 16:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Deleteper WP:V and WP:A AlfPhotoman 18:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
AIs own site is reliable source enought in my opinion: http://www.amnesty.sk/mf/index.php?page=stat&id=16&aid=1 --Ivanakralova 18:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep if the reference above is worked into the article AlfPhotoman 18:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Reference worked into article--Ivanakralova 18:42, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- delete published work consists of one co-written novel and one Master's thesis (though that thesis is linked to several times). The thesis seems not related to AI. The Amnesty link is simply documenting his existence as one of the Board-- many of the BoD are N, but its because of other work. Other articles are mentioned--if these can be documented, then that might be enough for N.. DGG 03:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep other works added aswell as science citation of the masters thesis --85.216.193.149 11:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- keep N proved by various activities--84.16.37.78 10:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC) — 84.16.37.78 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete per the absence of independent and non-trivial sources. The AI link, though notable and perhaps even sufficiently independent, is essentially a directory entry. -- Black Falcon 19:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.