Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Rajic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE — Gwalla | Talk 05:19, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Peter Rajic

Hoax. -- Longhair | Talk 10:05, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete -- Longhair | Talk 10:05, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ambi 10:19, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete hoax. JamesBurns 11:05, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • delete. See also his supposed wife Claudia Newman. Dunc|☺ 12:16, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • keep 'JoJo 13:37, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo'
  • Keep Be honest, Ambi. Jamesss 13:41, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes, these votes must be counted (JoJo) 'JoJo 13:47, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo'

  • Keep MarissaLeigh Peter Rajic is a subject of many amusment to many political keen beans. His wife is seen as particularly comical, this kind of vandelism is not acceptable, but that is no reason to remove real entires.
Comment: MarissaLeigh's only edits are to VfD. -- Longhair | Talk 13:41, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete both the article and the votes here by sockpuppets Columbia 13:51, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Columbia is a sock puppet!- 'JoJo 14:10, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo'

  • Keep Alexdowner We do have politicans in Australia you know!
    • Two edits made by this user, same as those made by Jojo and others. Obvious sockpuppetry. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 01:15, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete ...and more energy wasted; what a pity Lectonar 14:54, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete JoJo needs to find another hobby. --Habap 15:11, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • These are not the sockpuppets you're looking for. Delete. jglc | t | c 15:14, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, hoax. Alphax τεχ 15:13, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete unverified + sockpuppets. --Etacar11 16:10, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete hoax; see a list of SA MPs Septentrionalis 17:47, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Annoying trollishness. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 01:16, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep having spoken to some friends of mine, they assure me this is worth keeping. I agree wholeheartedly- 'Hotpants 07:02, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)Hotpants'
    • Users only edits are to vote keep on Longhair's VFD nominations. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:11, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - Sockpuppet-backed hoax. --FCYTravis 09:10, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Where do they say that? Until I see strong evidence to draw this into disrepute it's just one anonymous persons word against anothers. Keep- 'Freezer 09:40, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)Freezer'
  • Delete - rubbish backed by sockpuppets - Skysmith 10:35, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hotpants tells me via e-mail that he can swear to the veracity of these claims, but not in a court as Peter Rajic is his Priest- 'TagTeam 10:43, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)TagTeam'

  • Delete - Hoax. Of the list of VfDed vanity/hoax articles that JoJo and "friends" are supporting, at least three (Peter Rajic, Julia Fetherston/Fetherstone, James (H.) Robertson) appear together in this PDF at act.gov.au (google cached), which refers to them as "young people" who were involved with a 2002 InterACT conference in Australia. That could be a coincidence, sorry if it's old news. Question: was this Uncyclopedia article written by somebody from here in frustration over this VfD dispute, or was it written by the same author that wrote these hoax articles? That article involves VfD stars James "Cream Puff" Robertson, Peter Rajic, Timothy Horatio Caddey, and James Higgins. I got a kick out of the idea that someone could be permanently banned from the Coconino County Petting Zoo. -Eisnel 07:57, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.