Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Lee Teck Hin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 00:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Peter Lee Teck Hin

Peter Lee Teck Hin (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable blogger. I did tag it for speedy, but there does appear to be a claim of notability here insofar as being selected a "Youth Malaysia 100 blogger". Still, I was able to locate zero reliable secondary sources on this person, so notability is pretty shaky. Lankiveil (complaints | disco) 11:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment, although not forbidden per se, the creator and main contributor to this article has been User:Peter Lee Teck Hin. Lankiveil (complaints | disco) 11:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC).
  • Delete: utterly non-notable. Srpnor (talk) 11:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as nn. fails WP:BLP. Sting au Buzz Me... 12:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete utterly nn. Should have been speedied but I'm glad it wasn't as I wouldn't have had the chance to see his hilarious picture. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete fails notablity Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 18:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - Not notable. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 19:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Notability is the problem here. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 22:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete He even admits on his own userpage he's a "non-notable blogger" [1], though I have to wonder if he has any idea what he's saying. cab (talk) 04:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment, Well, looking at the blog itself, he seems to have a reasonable, although clearly not fluent grasp of English. It also appears that he's been blocked previously. There is really something odd going on here. Lankiveil (complaints | disco) 04:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC).
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 04:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as a vanity autohagiography. Bearian (talk) 15:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment The YouthMalaysia list he's likely referring to was a web competition organized by a Malaysian NGO. Anyone could list themselves. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.93.152.11 (talk) 16:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as nn, should be speedied really; the one source for a claim to notability is not really much of a source. · rodii · 21:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.