Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Hershey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Peter Hershey
An article on a history student who fails WP:BIO. As listed in the article, his accomplishments are: a self-published novel, a poem featured in a community newspaper, and a short story included in an on-line periodical. He is the recipient of an award at his college's student film festival, and will feature as an an extra in an upcoming mini-series. The creation of a single purpose account, the article cites an interview with Hershey (presumably unpublished) as one of its references. Victoriagirl 04:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Doesn't satisfy WP:BIO, citations are not secondary, plethora of reasons, most are above. Redian (Talk) 04:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - by that standard, I'm probably notable. Since I'm not notable, deletion inherits. --Haemo 06:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Clearly fails WP:BIO--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 06:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Snowball delete.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 07:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:39, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- 20-Mule Team Delete: per above, and add WP:COI in as well, since the creator is User:Pchers. I'm sure the subject's a hell of a swell fellow, but this isn't Myspace. RGTraynor 17:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
