Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Hattingh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Peter Hattingh

Peter Hattingh (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable, no external sites, Google search turns up a MySpace page... 21655 ^{ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ?} 19:20, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

External links added by Eastmain. Still NN? 21655 ^{ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ?} 00:14, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - Does not seem notable. Not much more I can say. — Parent5446 ^{(t n c k e l)} 19:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete- WP:COI Derek Andrews (talk) 19:26, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. An article about an individual that doesn't contain any personal information doesn't meet WP:RS, I think. This seems to be a coatrack for his companies. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:29, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as COI/OR. Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 20:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. I found some external links and added them, but I'm still not very happy with the article. --Eastmain (talk) 23:25, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Still delete. I don't think the source of any of those links or references are sufficiently removed from the subject to be independent or notable. Derek Andrews (talk) 10:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 23:25, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete As per earlier comments. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. KleenupKrew (talk) 08:30, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete This is a bit of a no-brainer to be honest. I myself am an internationally published poet. Who isn't? GetDownAdam (talk) 12:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

• Reply. I'm not. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete spammy-sounding fluff w/ no sources to back it up. -- Naerii 17:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. I've tagged it for WP:AUTO and WP:COI. Qworty (talk) 19:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.