The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete - Izehar 23:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Vanity article for a CA congressional candidate. Google=129. Also appears to be autobiographical by proxy (probably PR firm or agent) as the author has created only three other articles, also orphans with no links to them, and also borderline (or less) notable. DeleteAUTiger ʃ talk/work 21:58, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Stifle 01:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. --Terence OngTalk 11:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -Jcbarr 15:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.