Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Botham

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 01:01, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Peter Botham

Seems like an interesting guy but not terribly notable. --LeeHunter 23:10, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable enough, possible vanity. Megan1967 02:57, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: If the article can be expanded, I'm in favour of keeping it. The guy seems notable enough. --Spinboy 05:39, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks like a self written article (being a husband and father isn't notable, so shouldn't be listed, no matter how proud you are of your children). Can anyone find any sales of these books? I haven't on a quick search, which suggests his books haven't sold significantly, so then his being an author isn't notable. Neither is having a degree, or being a teacher for three decades (admirable, yes. Notable, no). Average Earthman 14:12, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable vanity. Receives about 380 Google hits, mostly for other people with the same name. --Deathphoenix 18:54, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.