Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter A Barnard

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 08:57, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Peter A Barnard

non relevant- vandalism-i put a speedy delete but it was removed Melaen 19:18, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, although I do believe your speedy delete was properly removed. There is some discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion policy/Reducing VfD load to hasten the deletion process on some articles, but vanity is not vandalism and under the current procedures cannot be speedied. DS1953 19:27, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete with all deliberate speed. -- BD2412 ^talk 19:28, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
• Delete and support Speedy as either attack page, nonsense, or vandalism. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:37, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete ASAP; I would question the rectitude of the speedy delete removal, as this page seems to be not vanity, but rather an attack page. jglc | t | c 20:14, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity/joke. --Etacar11 22:31, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete personal attack. JamesBurns 07:44, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The very first version of the aticle included the word "twat". This is vandalism/attack/kids with nothing better to do who keep vandalising this VfD page. func(talk) 17:44, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete drini ☎ 18:34, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Comment Reverted a blank by 172.201.209.78. Am adding this to my watchpage and will revert if I find any further vandalism. jglc | t | c 18:47, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.