The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – RobertT | @ | C 00:17, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
Appears to be vanity. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 16:47, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
Speedy delete as A7 JoJan 17:51, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
Speedy delete--Megan 17:56, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete- Unfortunately not a speedy. The article does attempt to assert the importance of the subject, but not successfully. Reyk 21:43, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete vanity. MONGO 02:01, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.