Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perunika

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:MUSIC. Unfortunately no one has stepped in to save this article. PeterSymonds (talk) 13:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Perunika

Perunika (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable a cappella group. Fails WP:MUSIC, as Yahoo reveals only one non-trivial story--this one from the San Diego Union-Tribune. I was in two minds as to whether to hit the AfD button, but the fact that the creator is Perunika (talk · contribs) clinched it. Blueboy96 18:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete, clearly promotional G11 material; creator was blocked for promotional use of a promotional username. Daniel Case (talk) 18:29, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Waffling I tagged this for speedy before the references were added -- funny how people don't add references until after something gets tagged -- and I agree with the obvious COI, but I think it's borderline notable at this point with the capsule reviews in major media and an AMG listing. Could possibly be saved. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:MUSIC & WP:COI.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 00:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:28, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.