Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personal Structures

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-09 08:01Z

[edit] Personal Structures

Personal Structures (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
Rene Rietmeyer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Article does not assert notability, nor does it seem coherent. Also seems to be an advertisement. Hobbeslover talk/contribs 21:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete no you can't have an article on wikipedia just because you think this item is awesome. Not yours. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nardman1 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete. OR. Inadequate references. No evidence of notability. Drivel. WMMartin 15:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure what the last word refers to. I trust it's not BITE. This is a public forum, where courtesy is required. Tyrenius 20:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Per nom. Freshacconci 20:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment The article on the artist may have potential if improved (both references and grammar--and I do realize that the main author is not a native English speaker, so others should go in and help). The "Personal Structures" movement or group is more of a problem--it is mainly speculative at this point, and has not been established as anything notable (the first symposium related to it is from 2005). Can we separate the two within this AfD? I'd vote for a Weak Keep on the artist, pending improvements, and a Speedy Delete on "Personal Structures". Freshacconci 23:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Article has improved with evidence of notability. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sarahpuschel (talk • contribs) 20:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC).
  • Comment This newly registered user is the article's creator. Also, the article itself has not improved at all. It now has alleged references, but I still do not see notability. Hobbeslover talk/contribs 22:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.