Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personal Knowledge Unit (PKU)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:55, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Personal Knowledge Unit (PKU)
Neologism of some kind that seems to be unused. Google gives no real hits. —Mulad (talk) 02:04, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Expand, and if its author did not have anything useful to say, then I'm in favor of deleting it -mysekurity 04:38, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. The article needs to be expanded. This PKU does sound noteworthy. Deletion will be necessary if no addition is made to it. DarthVader 05:06, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I can't find any reference to it. While Dr. Othman seems to be a linguist of some sort, the PKU doesn't seem to appear in any paper I can find. My guess is that it's vanity for the other person mentioned, who gets no hits on Google at all. --FreelanceWizard 06:01, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- 'Delete. Unverifiable, neologism. -- Natalinasmpf 10:00, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Delete, which changes to a weak keep if the author shows he is not planning on abandoning his article... Sirmob 13:16, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Criterion #1. N.b. the article is signed, albeit in a non-native English way. It says, "This is a term by this guy" and "this article was researched by me." I.e. vanity seems at the heart of it. It's not an article, though. Geogre 13:21, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as original research per Geogre. Xoloz 08:28, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, original research. carmeld1 02:12, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Article is practically content-free. Quale 07:58, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. O-R, no content (not even a sub-stub), and exactly one relevant Google hit for "Personal Knowledge Unit". — Asbestos | Talk 12:49, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.