Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perpendicular Universes

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 00:14, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Perpendicular Universes

The original nomination omitted the header, causing the first four comments here to appear to be an extension of the prior discussion. Now fixed. Rossami (talk) 16:58, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

google search shows two results, and the artilce doesn't make much sense bakuzjw (aka 578) 20:45, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• I get 811 results for "perpendicular universe" and 117 for "perpendicular universes", although some of these are probably about something else. Nonetheless, delete unless the original research problem is fixed up before end of VFD. JYolkowski 23:55, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • the google serach was under the guys name (DR. Kransov phd) not "perpendicular universe." bakuzjw (aka 578) 00:12, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
    • Fair enough, although I find it hard to believe that a real PhD can't spell "universe", "relatively", "large", "evidence", and "believed", among other words. (-: JYolkowski 03:22, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, original research, see Wikipedia:No original research. Random refernces to "perpendicular universe" in Google are not references to this guy's theory. -- Curps 02:56, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• The complex mathematical formula almost tricked me, but delete. --Plutor 18:03, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, appears to be nonsense, certainly OR. Pretzelpaws 19:51, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nonsense. --Ponder 20:42, 2005 Feb 14 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.