Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Permised

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Bratsche^{talk 5 pillars} 02:16, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Permised

Admitted neologism. Pity it's not a speedy. Fernando Rizo T/C 03:28, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delese. Gazpacho 03:46, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Looks like some guy just did a gaff on a website and decided to make an article on his misspelling. Delete. --Apostrophe 03:47, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Self-admitted neologism and non-notability. Dmeranda 03:50, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, the equivalent of bathroom-wall-scribbles. --Agamemnon2 09:36, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, as per Dmeranda. Alf 09:50, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, delete, delete - Er, why is this not a speedy? --Tysto 15:19, 2005 August 23 (UTC)
  • Because, Tysto, it meets none of the requirements for Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. Yes, I know that sucks. Fernando Rizo T/C 17:37, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.