Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Percleus

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. Postdlf 03:38, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Percleus

What do you think? I don't have any idea except this one -- Svest 06:37, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable, not sourced. Quale 07:16, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Just wanted to note that the article has been updated so that it is now sourced. No change in vote because now it's clearly non-notable. Quale 05:02, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. First, the article currently seems more like an ad for this content management system software. Second, I only get a couple of Google hits, thus not notable yet. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 07:22, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I am changing my vote to Abstain. As of now, I am unsure how widespread it is now, and how it might be spread out in the future. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 22:08, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. It is indeed www.percleus.com. It's a CMS like Slashcode, PHPNuke, etc, it's in PHP (they nearly all are), it's verifiable, and there is at least one site powered by it (I updated the article). --Tony Sidaway|Talk 22:04, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Yes it's real, and appears to power a whole two, apparently non-notable web sites. Is that sufficient? Maybe not, but I'll abstain. :) — RJH 02:50, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.