Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Percleus (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 11:01, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Percleus (2nd nomination)

Subject is an insufficiently notable content management system; see WP:SOFTWARE and WP:CORP#Criteria for products and services. As such, there are no credible, third-party sources available to verify the contents as required by WP:V. The official website appears to have been dormant since May 2005, and the software is used by only two minor websites. Googling produces only 20 unique hits, many of them unrelated sites or wiki-mirrors of this article. Was nominated for deletion in April 2005, but result was No Consensus with 1 delete opinion, 1 keep opinion, and 2 abstaining comments. No improvements or significant edits have been made in the past 2½ years. Thank you, Satori Son 19:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Vectro 04:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Tony Sidaway's comment in the last nomination. Just because it is now inactive doesn't mean that it has stopped being notable. Cynical 08:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: The last AfD was closed as "no consensus", so notability was not established by that process. If you personally believe this article has ever met the notability and verifiability requirements, I would be interested in hearing why. Thanks,  Satori Son 11:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Kla'quot 16:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.