Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peppermint Teaparty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 05:04, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Peppermint Teaparty, Nabil Azadi

Peppermint Teaparty (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

New Zealand arts webzine around for less than a year. Article creator seems to have done few edits outside of creating it. No claim to notability per WP:WEB made; no non-trivial coverage found among the two dozne Google results (mainly site itself, this article and mirrors, and blog entries. Seems promotional Daniel Case 04:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete for clear lack of notability; only 200 ghits. Also delete the article of the magazine's editor in chief:

Nabil Azadi (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by YechielMan (talk • contribs) 16:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC).

• • Per this vote, I am also nominating the following related page for lack of notability:

Nabil Azadi (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

• Delete fails per WP:WEB. Shows no notable 2nd party references for us to report as a 3rd party. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs) 22:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC).
• Delete lacks sources to pass WP:WEB.-- danntm ^T _C 01:05, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No sources provided and a Google News [1] and Google News Archive [2] comes up with nothing. Capitalistroadster 02:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 02:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. I realise that WP:HOLE is a pretty poor guideline to base a delete call on, but as an artist and arts writer working in New Zealand, I'm pretty sure I'd have heard of this site if it was in any way notable. Grutness...wha? 03:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.