Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pelf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 15:37, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pelf

Dicdef, unexpandable delete GTBacchus^(talk) 06:45, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

• Please put more effort into your nominations. In fact, consider writing a nomination instead of leaping straight towards the heady thrill of voting to delete that sucker. Cheers, fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 11:11, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Please consider checking the history before jumping straight towards the heady thrill of criticizing the wrong person. -GTBacchus^(talk) 16:19, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

    • I apologise. You did indeed write a nomination! I checked the history to see if someone else might have created the article, but not to see if another user might have changed your edit. My objection to nominations that don't look like nominations stands, but my criticism of you obviously can't. Silly me. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 16:27, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

• Wiktionary already has an entry for this, now we can Delete the article. --Timecop 06:49, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, it's already on Wiktionary and looks to be unexpandable (I hesitate to say "per nom", because there wasn't one). Perhaps replaced with a soft redirect might be appropriate? Probably just worth deleting outright. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 11:14, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

  Comment - There was a valid nomination (albeit not a wordy one - not much to say here), then it was changed by User:Timecop. Thanks. -GTBacchus^(talk) 16:19, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete dicdef, as per nomination. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 16:55, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.