Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peg Kerr

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep -- Francs2000 | Talk 02:30, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Peg_Kerr

This is a vanity page written by one livejournal user for another, as evidenced by reading this blog posting about it. I could easily write myself up as equally sensitive and ambitious. Alterego 22:13, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete proof that vanity doesn't absolutely always have to be written by the article subject. Good catch, Alt. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind
• Keep - I thought it'd be crap too, until I saw that she's published two novels, one of which was nominated for a Mythopoeic Award, pushes her above the line of notability. DS 23:46, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Having two novels published is a claim to notability especially when one was nominated for a reasonably significant award. Article is now in reasonable shape. Capitalistroadster 00:01, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Appears to be notable. JamesBurns 08:35, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - it may have been started by a friend but that doesn't mean that she doesn't have a reason to be on here. Certainly, it is in need of expansion, but not deletion. Tinderblast 17:37, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - it was started by a fan of the author - but surely that's to be expected? Agree with DS that PK is notable enough to deserve an entry. Zhasper 00:26, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.