Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peg (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Peg (band)

Peg (band) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Contested speedy. Only a bare assertion of notability, mostly by either name dropping or saying, "Hey! We're notable!" One CD and no indication of association with any labels, major or indie, does not meet the guidelines set forth in WP:MUSIC. No sources to back up claims of "significance". DarkAudit (talk) 03:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Googling for "Sean McMorris" and Peg produces 5 hits. They don't get much less notable than that, barring evidence to the contrary. eaolson (talk) 04:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, this unsourced band fails WP:MUSIC. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 11:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - tangential connection to Television isn't sufficient for notability. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 13:30, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete I assume that if this band really "received acclaim as an avant garde art band", the creator would have added a reference to the website of the organization or person that had given the acclaim. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 13:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:23, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.