Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peep brûlée

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Peep brûlée

Seems to be neologism - very few Google hits. --Ixfd64 03:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. But, man, the image of pyred Peeps made me laugh.  :) Monkeyman 03:55, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unverifiable, local term. But the peeps really weren't that funny. I say we hold a consesus on if the peeps were funny. Or maybe even a consesus on if we should be able to hold a consesus on if the peeps were funny. --Jay(Reply) 04:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Jay --Ruby 04:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. BrianGCrawfordMA 19:02, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 21:19, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as neologism. I like Peeps. Schizombie 22:13, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Per nomination. UncleFloyd 03:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with main Peeps article. Toasting them is sufficiently notable a use form to list on their page, but not for an independent article. No matter how much fun it is (where'd I put my Arc welder ...) Georgewilliamherbert 22:27, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.