Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Chirino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. KrakatoaKatie 23:31, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pedro Chirino

Pedro Chirino (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Notability - he merely recorded an incident. Guroadrunner 10:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, normally people from the 16th Century who make it into WP tend to be notable. Surprisingly, a simple Google search found plenty of references for Chrino on the web. hateless 20:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, Someone from the early 17th century must be notable for them to be remembered 400 years later in history. But the article needs extreme cleanup, if not a complete re-write. --Nenyedi ^TalkContribs_@ 21:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
• Comment -- he recorded something interesting, but that doesn't mean he's notable. But I am in favor of the slash-and-kill method if the AFD doesn't go through. Guroadrunner (original nominator) 13 March 2007
• Delete No refs no evidence of notability NBeale 07:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Now passes WP:ATT. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 04:48, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per improvements by Carolfrog (see diff). -- Black Falcon 21:01, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.