Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PeaceMaker (game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mailer Diablo 08:01, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PeaceMaker (game)

Delete as it still is in development. I think the game sounds like a great learning tool. It also comes across a bit like an ad. The content of the article is also heavily copied from the website. Gay Cdn 01:06, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. A worthy cause, but not (as yet) a notable contribution towards peace - let's hope that changes in the future, though. Tevildo 01:15, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep with massive ad/POV removal The game (and concept) have certainly been noted: here is an NPR story on the game, here is an Associated Press article (from MSNBC, although I also found the article on CNN and Yahoo News), and one of its creators spoke at the 2005 Game Developers Conference. I think that confirms sufficient notability. Yes, it's an ad, and yes, it's slightly crystal ballish, but I think it's still worthy of an article. -- Kicking222 01:17, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Seems to be reasonably notable. Bwithh 01:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per the above. Passes WP:SOFT with Kicking222's references. Might be a good idea to put them in the article... Tevildo 01:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The article is currently poor, but the game itself seems notable even though it is still in development. --Cswrye 05:26, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Tag it if need be, but the fact that something does not yet exist does not mean that it is worthy of deletion alone. J Milburn 12:03, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.