Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pcidata

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:46, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pcidata

A program written by (apparently) an undergraduate at the University of Wisconsin Madison. No evidence of notability. dbenbenn | talk 19:29, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

• It's used by people, I know that much, but is it commonly used? Gee whiz, I don't know about this one...weak delete for now since it doesn't seem to be in very common usage but I'm open to change. Lord Bob 20:01, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. As is, I don't even think it's even good enough to be a dictionary definition. Ifnord 20:10, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
• Some Google hits point at the developers site, Wikipedia and its mirrors., and some are obscure, but most seem to point at bug reports. My impression is of flawed software in early stages of development. Anyway, the article sucks, so delete per Ifnord. TheMadBaron 21:12, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.